LLL Footnote Reference Review / 脚注参照の点検

Which articles are checked? Only articles that follow a footnote convention. (1) [^id] references with [^id]: text definition paragraphs. (2) [n], [n,m], [n-m] or superscript-number references with a numbered list (or [n] text / n. text paragraphs) under a heading named Notes, Footnotes, Endnotes, References, 脚注, 注, 注釈, 注記, 参考文献 or 参考資料. Any other article is reported as "Not applicable" with no warnings. EmDash 1.4.0 itself has no footnote structure in its saved format, so this plugin reads these text conventions.

What are the results? Reference without a definition; definition never referenced; duplicate definition. They are candidates to check, never a statement that the article is wrong. If some blocks could not be read (HTML, tables, columns, unknown plugin blocks), the report says so.

What is not a reference? Code blocks and inline code, blockquotes, text inside 「」『』“” or paired straight quotes, [0], [2024], [1](url), [text][1], a [1]: link definition at the start of a paragraph, and a number directly after a digit, _, ) or ]. A [n] directly after English letters (claim[1]) is read as a reference, so arr[1] outside code in an article that has a notes section is also counted.

Heading anchors? Not checked here; see Internal Anchor Review.

Limits. Field JSON 128 KiB, 2000 blocks, 200 candidates, report 48 KiB. Exceeding a limit rejects the whole result with one fixed message.

Read capabilities only: content:read, schema:read, and content:revisions:read (only to read the current saved draft revision; revision history is not listed). One POST route requiring the host permission content:edit_own_drafts and a signed-in caller; host ownership checks apply. No writes, KV, storage, external HTTP, cron, hooks or API keys. Results exist only for the request; nothing is stored. Short excerpts of article text (up to 80 characters around a reference) appear in the panel and in the copied report, so choose where to share it. The report is tab-separated plain text; a cell that begins with =, +, - or @ gets a leading apostrophe so a spreadsheet does not run it as a formula. Failures return one fixed message with no internal details. Report vulnerabilities to contact@lx3.cafe without secrets.

読取3権限のみ。本文変更・保存・外部通信はありません。レポートには参照の前後最大80文字の本文が含まれるため、共有先に注意してください。脆弱性は contact@lx3.cafe へ、秘密を含めず連絡してください。

0.1.0

Adds a review panel for one saved Portable Text field: references without a definition, unused notes and duplicate definitions, for [^id] style and Notes-section style articles. Articles outside these conventions are reported as not applicable.

Install LLL Footnote Reference Review (footnote-reference-review) as a sandboxed plugin on EmDash 1.4.0 or later (below 2) with a configured supported sandbox runner. Open a saved article, choose the "Footnote Reference Review / 脚注参照の点検" editor panel, pick one Portable Text field and a language, then review. Edit, save, and review again. Select the whole plain report and press Cmd/Ctrl+C to copy. No automatic insertion or download.

What is read: the saved draft revision (or the published body); never text typed but not yet saved, and never the public page HTML. Free; no keys.

保存記事の編集画面でパネルを開き、本文項目と言語を選んで点検します。修正したら保存して再点検し、レポート全文を手動コピーします。未保存の入力・公開ページのHTMLは対象外。無料で完結します。